Posts Tagged abundance

Caution! Public Schools Are Teaching & Breeding Failure

With all due respect to those educational administrators that are trying desperately to make a difference, I believe that if we are not teaching success in our schools, we are teaching failure through negligence. On the bright side, educational philosophy has always been about teaching our children math, science, reading, writing, social studies, history, and so on. We all know the basic subjects taught in our public schools, and we generally agree on the importance of these matters. More “specialized” curriculum – like “life skills” – are typically elective classes, and instruct children on the basics of financial management, and the like (life skills that deal in the linear, the exact, the non-abstract are generally regarded as teachable on an elective basis). On the negative side, however, we do not teach our children lifelong accomplishment – to succeed – and how to create abundance in all areas of living. We do not instruct kids on the commonly accepted elements of success, and therefore what it means to be a contented, productive, accomplished, or happy person, if you will. Any adult of reasonable intelligence and caring should be interested in why we do not teach such skills to our children, and indeed what those “hard skills” of success, achievement, and abundance would be/could be. I would argue that the core components of success have not changed (and are in fact readily teachable), but it is the terms of measurement – or what constitutes the actual acquisition of success – that is relative, inconsistent, and ever changing. If teaching these success elements were compulsory, we might repair many homes, create better professionals, reduce crime rates, and simply spread more hope.

The prevalent educational philosophy is that success skills are left to the parent(s) in the home (or arguably ‘the streets’, or the child’s peers); it is not the responsibility of our educational system to teach abundance and success. The skills needed to enjoy a successful life deal in the realm of the inexact, the intangible, and the arbitrary or capricious, as opposed to the realm of letters, numbers, empirical data, scientific hypothesis, and events in history. We can readily teach “uniform subjects” that are widely accepted as truths, proven, de facto empirical, but teaching essential emotional management skills, effective and realistic goal setting, and across the board abundance acquisition is messy, highly subjective, relative, and inconsistent. It appears that to our educators and those who determine proper educational curriculum, our school agenda and teachers cannot be adequately “equipped” to teach such controversial and “inconsistent” (non-uniform) subject matter. They cannot conceive of a universally acceptable curriculum to teach lifelong success skills. And beyond the educational philosophical matter, perhaps, is the political aspect. To enter into the responsibility of teaching “success” is intrinsically perceived as politically impossible; we cannot all “universally” agree on exactly what those skills to be taught would be – or what would be overwhelmingly acceptable – and conceivably it borders on the spiritual, or perchance the individual belief system, and therefore laissez faire.

Let’s take a peek at the murky waters of the subject of success (and why it is not taught in school). So much has been written about success. So many success programs, books, CDs, and other media exist on the subject. A Google search (conducted on 10/21/2009) on the keyword “success” returns over 312-million results. The term is like one tiny star in the cosmos. I think it’s safe to say that ‘success’ is/has been an over-used word throughout our human world and throughout (recorded) history. It’s also fair to say that success means something different for each and every person, and yet most would agree that a simple and accurate definition might be: to obtain a desired result (or results).

Perhaps Dr. Norman Vincent Peale (1898-1993) was among the first of the modern-day success gurus with his “Power of Positive Thinking” work (circa 1956). And today we have success consultants, coaches, lecturers, and millions more people who make their living in one fashion or another from/on the subject of success (I wonder if there would be fewer of these private instructors if success were a scholastic subject?). In just my amazing lifespan (I’m 47), the technology boom has contributed (information) so overwhelmingly that it has made our world smaller in many senses, and yet so much more confusing because of all the voices that are now heard, increasing sensory overload. But success has not changed, in and of itself; as mentioned, only the “terms of measurement” are ever changing.

I remember thinking as a teenager in school: why is there no ‘owner’s manual’ for living a successful life? I would ponder being alone in a cold world; born unto inadequate role models, cloned teachers, and empty influencers, and realizing that ultimately we must invent our own ‘success manual’ for living. An extension of much of my early thoughts was to be in awe of the humility of life; the more I learned, the more I realized how little I truly knew. As time progressed I studied the success gurus and motivational experts. It was then that a ‘success manual’ did emerge from my thoughts, and I committed it to book format; the content would easily serve as course curriculum.

As I’ve noted, the body of work on the subject of success is nearly limitless. Therefore it must be hubris to suggest that I have something of value to add to the issue of human success, right? No, I do not believe that to be true. I believe that I have conceived something of extreme value. At the risk of being perceived as turning this article into a promotional piece, what I have developed and refined is a six-step system that virtually guarantees success and abundance in all areas of life, and the ability to maintain success over a lifetime. It is only recently that I understand how effortlessly these materials could be hugely useful in our schools. In brevity, the six steps are these: 1) Motives/Motivation, 2) Preparation (emotional/mental/physical), 3) Goal Setting (workshops), 4) Research and Development (of a plan or vehicle for attaining goals), 5) Consistent Action, and 6) Flexibility (in order to account for the human element).

Every once in a while something special and unexpected comes along. True, not very often does something new appear on the scene, but it certainly happens. Yes, even though it might seem that success is an exhausted, and exalted subject – and thus far academically or scholastically taboo – I have assembled in detail the exact six steps that are necessary to achieve lifelong success.

The book is entitled: “Lifetime Success in 6 Simple Steps”. It is my sincere promise – as the result of decades of study – that this is a brand new approach, encompassing the very best of what is known about the components of success, and combining that knowledge into teachable, logical, and progressive steps that ensure sustained, lifelong success. I invite you to check it out for yourself. If this work helps a pondering teen, makes our educational system take notice, or helps any of the millions of unemployed to a new, successful life then I am thrilled! Here is the link for the book: http://success-dude.com/lifelong-success/. Let’s teach our children to be a success!


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Balance, Boundaries, Exactness, Genius, and Success: A Magical Combination

When I was a child, I loved to watch a professional plate spinner entertaining a crowd. The plate spinner would balance multiple plates, each at the end of a stick, and keep adding more sticks with spinning plates, keeping them all balanced. The balance between gravity and centrifugal force would eventually win over the plate spinner and finally plates would begin to fall. I always mused that the plate spinner was a good metaphor for life; we rush around trying to keep all of our “plates” spinning (balanced), but it tends to become too much too fast, and we must reduce our spinning plates.

According to a current definition in Wikipedia, “balance” in the metaphysical or conceptual sense is defined as follows:
“balance is used to mean a point between two (or more) opposite forces that is desirable over purely one state or the other…” Sounds reasonable.

But as the plate spinner metaphor illustrates, balance is not achieved without boundaries. We achieve balance in all aspects of our lives by selecting exact limitations. Boundaries come from exactness, from limiting scope through a highly selective process. Another useful metaphor is the gymnast on the balance beam: without exactness of movement through limitation of scope, she forfeits balance and falls. Her highly selective process of developing balance is called practice.

Now I want to relate boundaries, exactness, and balance to an overused – in fact obsolete – concept called “networking” and “networks”.

Networks and networking – at their core – are designed to compound or multiply effectiveness or results through the power of multiple people and the resources of those in the network. The terms networking and networks are obsolete not only because they have become buzzwords, stretched and pulled into whatever shape is desired, but also because networks and networking typically means few limitations, the more the merrier, a shotgun effect. Most often the results of any given network are a function or reflection of the sheer numbers involved in that network. In this model there are intrinsic side effects, including chaos, lack of focus, lack of defined structure, lack of unity, and so many more negatives.

To achieve the highest levels of effectiveness and the strongest results, a network must have clearly defined boundaries and balance…it must be exact! In an Exact Network, each member is selected or recruited based upon their particular expertise, talent, and necessary contribution. In an Exact Network, the members are defined according to the essential and critical function that each serves within the network. One “macro” example of an Exact Network is government, although over time it has become a bureaucracy as opposed to a highly effective Exact Network. A better example is the hand picked executive team of a well-respected corporation, all focused on a coalition of goals and results. But even this is often times missing crucial elements in planning, execution, and vehicle for achievement.

The best imaginable results and desired return means Uber success, or the best possible success that can be imagined, nothing could be better. Therefore, an Exact Network that is focused on a coalition (unified and defined) of goals and results, is the best way to achieve “Uber Success”, provided they have an effective vehicle to reach their destination.

We create the opportunity for pure GENIUS, when we Generate Exact Networks to Institute Uber Success. Further, if such an Exact Network is provided with a clearly defined and entirely structured vehicle for attaining the goals of the Exact Network, the guaranteed result is uber success. I suggest that this vehicle is “Neologic Omnipotent Workshops” (NOW); a succession of goal-oriented, structured, pre-defined “workshops” wherein the most current ideas (Neologic), and all imaginable variables (Omnipotent) are entertained within pre-defined, structured workshops.

The result of all this is “G.E.N.I.U.S. NOW: The Mastermind Blueprint”, which is a guaranteed method for any business, group, or organization to easily achieve genius-level events and Uber Success for their organization or group. This new e-book, will become a true groundbreaker when it is “discovered”. Right now it is too new and therefore unknown. Get your copy now and learn everything necessary to achieve uber success, leaving behind any past failures and negative economic conditions. There is nothing more to buy; this is the real deal, revealing all the details of this “genius” method for unimaginable success.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Success and Assertiveness / Aggression

Some twenty years ago I received a poignant letter from my father that described his “mid-life crisis” and his final acceptance of his lot in life. The content of the letter did not surprise me, but did confirm ponderings I had considered many times. I’ll come back to this letter later.

My father is by no means an aggressive or assertive person; humility, selflessness, and altruistic diligence seem to be his mantra. I have the deepest respect for his talent, his principles, and his integrity. First and foremost, he is an abstract acrylic artist, professionally practicing his craft at least 50 years (to view his work click here). Aside from that, his distinguished career has been teaching Fine Art on the college level since before I was born (I think his first teaching position was officially in 1960 or 61). I can absolutely attest with confidence that anyone who knows my father would agree that he is not an aggressive and assertive individual.

Back to the letter and his mid-life crisis. He wrote that he had experienced some depression surrounding his chosen profession and the making of his artwork. You see he knew without doubt that he was an excellent teacher. Throughout his career he had received letters from past students sharing accolades for his teaching ability, as well as exceptional year-end reviews every year he taught. The dilemma was this: he had not gained the audience he had hoped for, or perhaps dreamed of, for his artwork; he knew he was a competent teacher, but wanted to have the same confidence about his art. In my mind, his personal definition of success included wide recognition as an accomplished and appreciated artist. Although admittedly I am/was biased, I have always adored his artwork and in my earlier years did not understand why he had a limited audience.

As my worldly experience grew, I came to have an informed opinion on the matter. It was not my father’s artwork that lacked some quality or appeal; it was my father’s principles or personal integrity that held back all possibility for large-scale exposure to his artwork. I still believe that if he had large-scale exposure – meaning some influential advocates working on his behalf – his artwork and his ultimate confidence in artistic accomplishment would be realized. But alas, my father is not aggressive and would not take steps to “play the game” of artist fame. Even if he were aware of the various compulsory activities for reaching a large audience for his art, he did not (and would not) even consider hiring another individual to work (aggressively or assertively) in his stead. In my opinion, the years have flown by with many “missed opportunities” because of the lack of aggressive / assertive aptitude. And yet, I admire his principles of integrity.

The story about my father brings to light a legitimate point: most often – and I cannot think of exceptions – success requires assertive aggression in order to be realized and maximized. My father’s values dictate that aggression is not something he can do in good conscience. My take on the matter is that assertive aggressive behavior is indeed a necessary tool for success, but only when practiced within one’s value set and principles of integrity. We must act aggressively or assertively on behalf of the goodness in our heart. Oh, and to my Dad I say: “You need not be aggressive nor have a huge audience for your art! You are a huge success in my book!”


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Uses wordpress plugins developed by www.wpdevelop.com SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline This site is protected by WP-CopyRightPro